This is taken out of “The Seach for the Perfect Golf Club” by Tom Wishon. I am posting this because of an acticle in Golf Digest that just came out.
Let me digress a bit on the issue of driver length because it is a particularly sore point with me.
As you’ve probably already gathered, 90% of the drivers sold in shops are too long for most players. If you follow the simple procedures outlined in this chapter you will know whether your current driver is longer than your best-fit length. If it is, get it cut down and reswingweighted to the shorter length, and don’t be shy about doing it. Even better, head out and get custom fitted for a new driver with both the right length AND best loft for your physical makeup, ability, and swing. Trading off accuracy for distance is simply not worth it.
Let’s start with the issue of distance since so many golfers believe longer lengths automatically mean longer shots. You probably think you can get more distance with longer shaft, right?
In a test conducted and documented by one of the compaanies that also specializes in fitting reseach, drivers ranging from 42″ to 46″ were put to test on a swing robot that DOES have the athletic ability to swing longer clubs and hit them on-center. Here are the data (see table). Read it for yourself.
But wait. The plot Thickens.
There is another reason for having a shorter club. It appears that, in the hands of real people (as opposed to a swing Robot), the shorter club might very well hit the ball not just with more accuracy, but farther as well.
Do you remember our discussion in chapter 2? For every quarter inch by which you miss the sweet spot on your club, you lose about five yards in distance. Miss it by half inch and you lose 10 yards; three-quarters inch, 15 yards, and so forth.
Conversely, if you can gain enough control of the head to hit the ball even a quarter inch closer to the sweet spot, you will gain back all the yardage you think you are losing by using a shorter shaft. This, by the way, is the reason most people do end up hitting shorter-length drivers farther. They’re simply hitting closer to the sweet spot more often because the shorter club is easier for them to contrl and thus improve shot consistency.
EFFECT OF DRIVER LENGTH ON DISTANCE
DR LENGTH SWING SPEED BALL SPEED CARRY DISTANCE
42 90 133.0 209.7
43 90 133.2 210.1
44 90 133.5 210.5
45 90 133.6 210.7
46 90 133.8 211.0
The above information shows how futile it is to play with a driver that is too long. Finding the correct length for the individual golfer will ALWAYS result in game improvement.
Earlier I told you a very important fitting maxim about length…..
The proper length for all golfers is the length that the golfer can hit SOLID AND ON-CENTER the highest percentage of the time.
If you are hitting a 45″ driver so that your on-center hit percentage with this driver length is well below 50%, your longest length to hit solid and on-center the highest percentage of the time may be as much as 2″ shorter. To other golfers with a little higher on-center hit percentage, the longest length to hit most solid might be only 1″ shorter.
As I said earlier, wrist-to-floor dimension is only the start for coming up with the best length for your game. It has to be tempered with consideration of your swing plane, and ball-striking ability to end up finding the longest length that you can hit solid and on-center the highest percentage of the time.
If the distance from your wrist to the floor is less than 40″ and you’re not a good ball striker, then a 45″ driver is too long. If your driver swing speed is 90 mph or less then you likely need more than an 11 degree loft. Simple as that.
There it is, Tom Wishon on driver length. My own personal experiance has been that golfers that I have custom fitted hit shorter drivers longer and better. As a custom club fitter, I have not built a 45″ driver in years. If you are interested in get this book ” The seach for the Perfect Golf Club” you can contact me at www.heisergolf.com or get it at www.wishongolf.com and I think www.amazon.com has them also. Thank you for reading my blogs, Jerry